Skip to content

#2313. Fix expected static type in upper_bound_A01_t05.dart #2314

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2023

Conversation

sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@chloestefantsova chloestefantsova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks!

@chloestefantsova chloestefantsova merged commit e705ec1 into dart-lang:master Oct 17, 2023
copybara-service bot pushed a commit to dart-lang/sdk that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
2023-10-23 [email protected] Fixes dart-lang/co19#2319. Fix roll failures (dart-lang/co19#2321)
2023-10-23 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#1400. [Extension types] Add more top types tests (dart-lang/co19#2322)
2023-10-18 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#1400. [Extension types] Add more superinterfaces tests (dart-lang/co19#2315)
2023-10-18 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#2291. Add more Link.createSync() tests. Part 2 (dart-lang/co19#2316)
2023-10-17 [email protected] Fixes dart-lang/co19#2304. Add more `Object` member tests (dart-lang/co19#2312)
2023-10-17 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#2313. Fix expected static type in upper_bound_A01_t05.dart (dart-lang/co19#2314)

Change-Id: Id5279b7bad5e45c7e8a5d2fa7cbffe49bd1b2093
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/331860
Reviewed-by: Erik Ernst <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Thomas <[email protected]>
@sgrekhov sgrekhov deleted the co19-2313 branch January 10, 2024 08:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants