Correct the pubspec.yaml, we require 1.23.0

[matanlurey]

... for importing dart:io into Dartium, specifically it looks like.

Closes #57.

[dustyholmes-wf]

It seems that this solution will leave people on 1.22.0 pulling version 0.11.3+10 incorrectly. Should there be a version in between this fix and the current that corrects the library for the stable release of dart?

[matanlurey]

I think we're going to try and pull the previous version... @kevmoo any update?

[nex3]

Can you add a CHANGELOG entry for this?

[matanlurey]

I don't want to merge this until we figure out how to fix the previous release (i.e. either roll it back first or publish a new 1.22.0 release with the last commit reverted). @kevmoo WDUT?

[kevmoo]

I vote for rollback. My understanding is that natalie is running w/ that - as of an hour ago...

…

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Matan Lurey ***@***.***> wrote: I don't want to merge this until we figure out how to fix the previous release (i.e. either roll it back first or publish a new 1.22.0 release with the last commit reverted). @kevmoo <https://github.com/kevmoo> WDUT? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#58 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABCijZuQEafXEkt1oIPM4HyFSqIHr_Wks5rdiKggaJpZM4MEhly> .

[dustyholmes-wf]

I no longer see 0.11.3+10 on pub. Looks like it has been rolled back.

[nex3]

Yep, I yanked 0.11.3+10. Given that, I think it might make sense to wait on landing/releasing 0.11.3+11 until 1.23 is stable. @kevmoo, how urgent is it that we have a mirrorless version of this released?

[kevmoo]

Natalie: will follow-up w/ you offline.

…

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Natalie Weizenbaum < ***@***.***> wrote: Yep, I yanked 0.11.3+10. Given that, I think it might make sense to wait on landing/releasing 0.11.3+11 until 1.23 is stable. @kevmoo <https://github.com/kevmoo>, how urgent is it that we have a mirrorless version of this released? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#58 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABCirhYvUHm6oxpgp_MeOwvdhe0RegFks5rdifTgaJpZM4MEhly> .

[kevmoo]

@nex3 Let's get this out w/ the -dev constraint. It'll let our flutter folks roll forward.

[tvolkert]

Even once SDK 1.23 is stable, some users won't have it, so do we need to release a 0.11.3+11 version cut off a branch that doesn't import dart:io anyway?

[nex3]

@tvolkert No, we yanked the version with the invalid SDK constraint.