-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 219
Allow specifying an explicit location for test/groups #2481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jakemac53
merged 14 commits into
dart-lang:master
from
DanTup:add-test-location-override
Apr 28, 2025
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4a65a97
Allow specifying an explicit location for test/groups
DanTup d6c9f36
Make TestLocation constructor take Uri, support filtering org-dartlan…
DanTup efb19e2
Use location.serialize in the JSON reporter
DanTup 2044d02
Add GroupEntry.parent and wire up in declarer + deserialization
DanTup bf6f034
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into add-test-location…
DanTup d680e7c
Move re-parenting to Group() constructor + update changelog
DanTup 35a6ef0
Delete settings.json
DanTup 675418f
Update .gitignore
DanTup 916ecbd
Update CHANGELOG.md
DanTup e584b33
Bump version
DanTup 888a9e8
Fix versions
DanTup 990f13f
Clone setup/teardown with forPlatform()
DanTup 4dcac4b
Remove unnecessary parent assignment
DanTup 240e4e6
Clone tests in filter() and in tests that assign to new groups
DanTup File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe these URIs should be package root relative? Or at least support that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added test cases for
org-dartlang-app:///
for the filtering, although it's not clear to me what supportingorg-dartlang-app
here would mean for the JSON... I think the clients of the JSON reporters would always expect file paths? If we supportedorg-dartlang-app
here, would they need to be translated to real file paths somewhere?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I do think it will mess up some of these use cases - one thing we can try externally is running tests with build_web_compilers (build_runner test -- -p chrome), and see what all it takes to get things working.
Ultimately none of this works today anyways, so its probably ok if we just leave it in a state where it still doesn't work, as long as internally package:test does something sensible and we can leave any extra bits for later.