-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat: permissionless-proposals #11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two small suggestions before merging:
It might be helpful to briefly mention the current use of attestations for delegate sign-offs, just to set the ground in how approvals currently work.
Let’s clarify whether the Top100DelegatesProposalValidator
becomes the new proposer for the Governor or whether we're modifying the Governor directly with a Proposer modifier. Either approach is valid (although we were discussing on not to modify the governor directly), but we should make the intention explicit.
Otherwise, looks great!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Feelling optimistic 🔴. Looks great : )
* fix: design doc * fix: proposal voting type section * fix: purpose description * fix: grammar
Description
This document outlines the design for a step towards permissionless proposals in the Optimism governance system. The goal is to allow top delegates to submit a proposal on-chain without requiring prior approval or gatekeeping by the manager. Instead, if all automated gating rules are met, the proposal is submitted for voting.
This validation process is aimed to happen on-chain from a new contract that we introduce
Top100DelegatesProposalValidator
.