-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Implement a Devfile Registry operator #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Implements the DevfileRegistry custom resource based on the devfile registry operator design doc. In addition to the spec, `dr` and `devreg` are added as shortnames. Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
Implements the core business logic of the Devfile Registry operator, allowing registries to be deployed on Kubernetes and OpenShift. Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
Implements a simple integration test framework for the Devfile Registy operator, based on the framework used for the devworkspace operator (see https://github.com/devfile/devworkspace-operator/tree/master/test/e2e) The following functionality is tested currently: - Simple devfile registry deploy - Simple devfile registry deploy with TLS enabled - Updating an existing devfile registry instance Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
- Make sure IsTLSEnabled fucntion is used - Add sample registry.yaml file Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
Now that we've switched over to using an nginx proxy to expose both the index server and OCI registry, we no longer need to expose the OCI registry directly. Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
"DevfileRegistry custom resource" looks good to me, currently I am reviewing "Devfile Registry operator core logic " |
- Updates the out-of-date DevfileRegistry CR sample - Removes the sample comments from fields in the DevfileRegistry custom resource definition. - Cleans up the function to delete old PVCs and updates its logic a bit to be more clear - Use defaults for readiness/liveness probes Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
@GeekArthur @elsony Thanks for reviewing! I've updated the PR based on your review comments |
@johnmcollier Thanks for changes! I already done the review and left some minor comments. |
@johnmcollier For me, just change the svc/pvc typo is fine for this PR, we can leave all the refactor/improvement work for the followup PRs. I am gonna approve the PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
@GeekArthur The if statement refactor's a quick change so I'm gonna update that too when I update the svc typo. Thanks! |
- Fix pvc->svc typo - Clean up if statement check on deleting pvc Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
@GeekArthur Updated! Mind re-adding the lgtm label if you have no concerns? Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Re-add LGTM!
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: elsony, GeekArthur, johnmcollier The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What does this PR do?
Fixes devfile/api#190
Implements a
DevfileRegistry
Kubernetes custom resource and operator usingoperator-sdk
v1.1, based off of the approved design proposal for such an operator.To make reviewing easier, I've squashed my changes down to 4 commits. If you want to see the original commit history, take a look at https://github.com/johnmcollier/registry-operator.
Overview
In all, this PR does the following:
Implementation of a
DevfileRegistry
custom resource in theregistry.devfile.io
API group.DevfileRegistry
(case-insensitive)DevfileRegistries
(case-insensitive)devreg
,dr
(case-sensitive)Implementation of an operator that manages instances of
DevfileRegistry
resources and deploys Devfile registries onto a Kubernetes or OpenShift clusterDevfileRegistry
resources. The defaultRolling
update strategy is used for the devfile registry deployment to ensure zero-downtime.Simple integration test framework. Based on a pre-existing framework from the devworkspace-operator (see https://github.com/devfile/devworkspace-operator/tree/master/test/e2e).
GitHub workflow actions for building and pushing the operator image up to quay.io
* Does not include support for creating secrets with cert-manager at this time, as I've found that the cert-manager API (including the necessary Go types) is not compatible with the versions of the
client-go
andcontroller-runtime
packages used by operator-sdk.Directory Structure
config/
operator-sdk
CLI. I only did some minor tweaking by hand where needed (adding labels to the operator deployment, for example.)api/v1alpha1/
devfileregistry_types.go
contans the type definition for theDevfileRegistry
custom resource.groupversion_info.go
andzz_generated.deepcopy.go
are generated/modified by theoperator-sdk
CLI.controllers/
Reconcile()
indevfileregistry_controller.go
is where the bulk of this logic is located.ensure.go
ensures that the necessary resources for the devfile registry are deployed on the cluster and up-to-dateupdate.go
contains the necessary functions for updating the needed devfile registry resources.pkg
registry/
functions for generating Kube resource structs (like Deployments, Services, etc) that are then deployed by the operatorcluster/
andconfig/
contains functions for detecting if we're running on OpenShift, and storing that resulttests/integration
examples/
contains the yamls used in the testspkg/tests/
: contains the integration testsHow to deploy (OpenShift):
From the root of the repository:
make install &&
make deploy`oc apply -f registry.yaml
oc get dr -w
Testing
tests/integration
). Can be run withmake test-integration
. The following scenarios are covered:pkg/registry
package. Can be run withmake test
.controller-runtime
code is quite sparse and good examples are near non-existent, so this is something we'll want to look into.