Add random request ID (closes #22) #25
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit does not change the behaviour of this file. Instead it stores the options in a variable to remove one of the two curl blocks that have been identical for the most part. `&> /dev/null` is not needed if `-v` is omitted and `-s` is used.
Adds a random unique ID to the request. As the POST data is never logged, this should prevent replay attacks even if logging is set to verbose.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a random unique ID to the request.
As the POST data is never logged, this should prevent replay attacks even if logging is set to verbose.
If the randomness is not trusted an additional salt can still be added using
but this shouldn't be necessary.
Also the user can verify, that the request is unique by storing the previous request IDs. But I don't think this is necessary either.
Therefore I conclude that this PR closes #22.