Add documentation for redirecting 443 SSL traffic to any container port #17178
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a reopening of a 1 year old pull request: #14739 It was assigned to a maintainer but never got reviewed. I am reopening it because I think forwarding HTTPS traffic to a non-privileged container 443:8080 is a VERY common use case, and well worth the extra example here in the docs.
If you're questioning whether or not this is valuable, Here's a ~5000 word blog post someone wrote trying to accomplish the same thing in a VERY hacky way
Original PR
What does this extra example show? How to forward HTTPS 443 traffic to a container's port 8080.
At first glance, this may look like a redundant documentation entry. After all, we just showed SSL termination right above this example. We're cluttering the docs! Let me directly address this:
x-aws-protocol
flag on this entire page. This adds a very helpful use case.x-aws-protocol
flag, plus learning the correctx-aws-cloudformation
overlay, plus understanding the difference between all the load balancer sub objects (TargetGroup, Listener, LoadBalancer) and knowing which fields to override is non-trivial.Proposed changes
Accept this example into the documentation.
Related issues (optional)
#14739