-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
DataProtection and scaling /8 #33104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 15 commits
f524f55
7e7f446
09a8106
ba71c7b
36f9423
1973c82
73d70c1
907cfc6
6ea6eec
8c27b91
5dea93a
ba6186b
0d6f57d
33d328c
fff74ab
4963274
065ba19
2201cd3
ec06d56
e058df8
6a7ebb0
96a80b3
50e65a4
807f8f6
6e07927
8537b5f
5e53be9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ | ||
--- | ||
title: Configure ASP.NET Core Data Protection in distributed or load-balanced environments | ||
author: acasey | ||
description: Learn how to configure Data Protection in ASP.NET Core for multi-instance apps. | ||
ms.author: acasey | ||
ms.date: 7/18/2024 | ||
content_well_notification: AI-contribution | ||
ms.prod: aspnet-core | ||
uid: security/data-protection/configuration/scaling | ||
--- | ||
|
||
# Configure ASP.NET Core Data Protection in distributed or load-balanced environments | ||
|
||
:::moniker range=">= aspnetcore-8.0" | ||
|
||
ASP.NET Core [Data Protection](xref:security/data-protection/introduction) is a library that provides a cryptographic API to protect data. Data Protection protects anti-forgery tokens, authentication cookies, and other sensitive data. However, in some distributed environments that don't put data protection keys in shared storage, when an app scales horizontally by adding more instances: | ||
|
||
* It's necessary to explicitly configure Data Protection to establish a shared storage location for Data Protection keys. | ||
* There’s ***NO*** guarantee that the HTTP POST request, used to submit a form, will be routed to the same instance that served the initial page via an HTTP GET request. If the requests are handled by different instances, the anti-forgery tokens aren’t synchronized, and an exception occurs. Sticky sessions via [ARR Affinity](/azure/app-service/manage-automatic-scaling?#how-does-arr-affinity-affect-automatic-scaling) routes user requests to the same node. However, ARR can reduce the scalability of a web farm. | ||
|
||
The following distributed environments provide automatic key storage in a shared location: | ||
amcasey marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
* [Azure apps](/aspnet/core/security/data-protection/configuration/default-settings). For more information see <xref:security/data-protection/configuration/default-settings#key-management>. | ||
* Newly created Azure Container Apps built using ASP.NET Core. For more information see [Autoscaling considerations | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I've asked ACA for a date we can use in place of "newly created". There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Did you get a date? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @claudiaregio Can you remember how we scoped this? I've suddenly remembered that this might only affect Aspire apps for now? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
](/azure/container-apps/dotnet-overview#autoscaling-considerations). | ||
|
||
The following scenarios do ***NOT*** provide automatic key storage in a shared location: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This list still feels off to me. What if we framed it as a list of caveats and dropped the mention of non-Azure and ARR? If ARR is important, we could say that it's an alternative (that applies everywhere, not just non-Azure) though, personally, I think we covered that adequately in the intro. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @amcasey Can you use the suggestion feature to rough draft your approach? I can wordsmith your suggestion |
||
|
||
* Separate [deployment slots](/azure/app-service/deploy-staging-slots), such as Staging and Production. | ||
* Azure Container Apps built using ASP.NET Core Kestrel 7.0 or earlier. For more information see [Autoscaling considerations | ||
Rick-Anderson marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
](/azure/container-apps/dotnet-overview#autoscaling-considerations). | ||
* Asp.net core apps hosted on multiple non-Azure VMs that don't use server affinity. Server affinity ensures that a client's requests are always routed to the same server so having the keys in a shared location is not necessary. For more information see [Server affinity](/azure/app-service/manage-automatic-scaling?#how-does-arr-affinity-affect-automatic-scaling). | ||
|
||
:::moniker-end | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I couldn't figure out a nice way to phrase "ACA will do this for you automatically, if you let it". There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. review my rewrite and use the suggestion feature if needed. |
||
|
||
[!INCLUDE[](~/security/data-protection/configuration/scaling/includes/scaling7.md)] |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
|
||
:::moniker range="< aspnetcore-8.0" | ||
Rick-Anderson marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
<!-- | ||
Duplicate of primary doc, only change: | ||
using .NET 8.0 | ||
--> | ||
|
||
:::moniker-end |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.