-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Scrub Fast Tree Family #2753
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Scrub Fast Tree Family #2753
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
38e03c4
Clean FastTree.cs and FastTreeArguments.cs following instructions in …
wschin 099768d
Go through all places once
wschin b90dcd3
Address comments
wschin ab58a46
Address comments and update entry-point catalog
wschin 01d6830
Update F# tests
wschin f323b00
Address comments
wschin 8d27bab
Address comments
wschin dd3c8a2
Remove extra short names for entry point BC
wschin e9745b6
Address some comments
wschin 8e93762
Improve early-stopping metric field
wschin 004d4cc
Update entry points
wschin 1b4474c
Address comments
wschin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed because our public APIs doesn't provide those functions. #Resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But you can still traverse through trees with new structure, right?
In reply to: 260562343 [](ancestors = 260562343)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, we cannot but this definitely should be hidden here. @[email protected], do you think this feature is required in tree's public APIs?
In reply to: 261011054 [](ancestors = 261011054,260562343)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the trees should enable someone to explain what the tree is. I wouldn't make evaluation code part of the API. Any more than we insist that linear model parameters expose "do dot product" as a method on the model parameters. Both things are potentially useful of course, but we don't need it as part of our public API (at least at first).
In reply to: 261417026 [](ancestors = 261417026,261011054,260562343)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good. I feel evaluation module should be independent to the expression of the trained objects. Thanks you!
In reply to: 261734289 [](ancestors = 261734289,261417026,261011054,260562343)