-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Fixing ONNX test #3253
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fixing ONNX test #3253
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
925bdf0
The test pipeline for consuming an ONNX model would fail due to the
singlis f278dd1
When adding an ONNX transform to an ML.NET pipeline, an exception would
singlis 973531f
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/dotnet/machinelearning
singlis 0c84021
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into singlis/onnx
singlis 9c19726
Reverted back to using VectorScoreColumn
singlis 962e8b4
Updating comment to reflect the current onnx behavior
singlis 3d0a318
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/dotnet/machinelearning
singlis 8706388
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into singlis/onnx
singlis 8c9c177
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/dotnet/machinelearning
singlis ab6055c
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into singlis/onnx
singlis 155212b
Adding in a check for variable vector
singlis e215b33
Moved the check for variable vector
singlis File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if input col.Kind == VariableVector, how is that case handled? If not handled, should throw exception.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so prior to this change, we allowed VariableVector in that it would not throw -- this change now allows for vector and simple types. I would prefer to have a test that uses VariableVector, but I have yet to find something that provides a VariableVector output AND can be saved to ONNX.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jignparm from our conversation, you mentioned that we should not have allowed VariableVector to begin with and should fix as part of this change. I have updated the code to reflect that, but we should have a test that confirms if this works correctly. I have created the following issue for tracking #3375