-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
AutoML aggregate exception #5631
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
michaelgsharp
merged 5 commits into
dotnet:master
from
michaelgsharp:aggregate-cancelled-exception
Mar 2, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c495714
added check for aggregate exception
michaelgsharp 55f3164
Update src/Microsoft.ML.AutoML/Experiment/Experiment.cs
michaelgsharp b5324e8
Update src/Microsoft.ML.AutoML/Experiment/Experiment.cs
michaelgsharp 97e23a2
pulled message out to private variable so its not duplicated
michaelgsharp 04a7943
Update src/Microsoft.ML.AutoML/Experiment/Experiment.cs
michaelgsharp File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To add a unit test focusing on
OperationCanceledException
, you could set the AutoML setting to use only FastTree:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have tried that, but it only throws this exception in 1 specific method and this wasn't a stable repro. Not stable enough to try and have a consistent test for it anyways.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed. After discussing, even restricting to only FastTree will not make for a stable unit test.
If the timeout occurs in certain steps of FastTree,
AggregateException
is thrown; while at other steps,OperationCanceledException
is thrown.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you force it with a test-specific Trainer, or set of trainers?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried that. The problem is that there is only 1 specific place that causes this issue when a timeout occurs, and I haven't found a way to get it to repro consistently without modifying the method to always throw there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking more along the lines of a test-only mock trainer. Ignore if we don't already have a framework / pattern for this, that'd be more of a future-looking test strategy piece of feedback.