Skip to content

Remove unneeded intermediate async for Ethernet #1864

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 1, 2023
Merged

Conversation

earlephilhower
Copy link
Owner

Remove the always pending worker whose job it was to fire another async worker after a timeout.

Remove the always pending worker whose job it was to fire another async
worker after a timeout.
@earlephilhower earlephilhower merged commit 971c235 into master Dec 1, 2023
@earlephilhower earlephilhower deleted the ethy branch December 1, 2023 18:50
earlephilhower added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2024
Fixes #1973

The periodic LWIP pump/Ethernet packet reader async_context stopped
firing occasionally under high packet loads, causing the LWIP stack
to become unresponsive to any incoming data.

Re-implement the 2-step process for polling (like the CYW43 driver
from the RPI folks does) and undoes #1864 change.
earlephilhower added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2024
Fixes #1973

The periodic LWIP pump/Ethernet packet reader async_context stopped
firing occasionally under high packet loads, causing the LWIP stack
to become unresponsive to any incoming data.

Re-implement the 2-step process for polling (like the CYW43 driver
from the RPI folks does) and undoes #1864 change.
earlephilhower added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2024
Fixes #1973

The periodic LWIP pump/Ethernet packet reader async_context stopped
firing occasionally under high packet loads, causing the LWIP stack
to become unresponsive to any incoming data.

Re-implement the 2-step process for polling (like the CYW43 driver
from the RPI folks does) and undoes #1864 change.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant