Skip to content

Adds tech preview macro, updates experimental #2340

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jan 20, 2022
Merged

Conversation

goodroot
Copy link
Contributor

@goodroot goodroot commented Jan 6, 2022

Adds a new macro for tech preview, updates old experimental macro to keep them both.

Closes #2305.

Copy link
Member

@gtback gtback left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Just a couple suggestions to keep things clear and tidy 🧹

Copy link
Contributor

@jrodewig jrodewig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a minor comment about the docs. Otherwise, I agree with @gtback's comments.

Copy link
Contributor

@chriscressman chriscressman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, aside from the issues already raised

Copy link
Member

@gtback gtback left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks @goodroot

@goodroot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gtback Hi! The self-test test is giving me grief. Any insight?

@gtback
Copy link
Member

gtback commented Jan 13, 2022

I'll 🧹 it up, @goodroot !

@goodroot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gtback Any word? :) We wanna close this out soon.

@gtback
Copy link
Member

gtback commented Jan 20, 2022

Sorry, I lost track of this one. I'll take a look now.

@gtback
Copy link
Member

gtback commented Jan 20, 2022

@goodroot looks like there was some inconsistency between changes to the admonition text and the strings used in tests. I updated them and hopefully this version will pass.

@gtback
Copy link
Member

gtback commented Jan 20, 2022

Finally! @goodroot feel free to merge when you're ready to.

@goodroot goodroot merged commit 38f4b41 into master Jan 20, 2022
@goodroot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks Greg :D I appreciate you.

@goodroot goodroot deleted the kellen/tech-preview branch January 20, 2022 22:13
v1v added a commit to v1v/docs that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
…tral-naming

* upstream/master: (28 commits)
  Fixes .net book generation. (elastic#2367)
  Add main branch to elasticsearch-net repo to docs build. (elastic#2196)
  Update attributes.asciidoc (elastic#2365)
  Note that the full path is required for local doc build (elastic#2364)
  Bump current version to 7.17 (elastic#2333)
  moves old file back to bottom
  add new path for kibana links check
  apm: Neutral naming for apm-agent-java (elastic#2350)
  Change current to MS-68 (elastic#2355)
  Remove unnecessary branch mapping for package-spec (elastic#2359)
  Adds tech preview macro, updates experimental (elastic#2340)
  [DOCS] Add `plugins-7x` and `plugins-6x` attributes (elastic#2358)
  apm: Neutral naming for apm-agent-python (elastic#2348)
  apm: Neutral naming for apm-agent-rum-js (elastic#2354)
  apm: Neutral naming for apm-agent-dotnet (elastic#2352)
  apm: Neutral naming for apm-agent-nodejs (elastic#2353)
  Neutral naming for apm-agent-go (elastic#2351)
  apm: Neutral naming for apm-agent-php (elastic#2349)
  Add 7.last attribute for APM Guide (elastic#2356)
  [apm] main branch for apm-agent-ruby (elastic#2347)
  ...
jrodewig added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
Updates the old `experimental` admonition to use `preview` text when displayed inline.

Relates to #2340
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Experimental -> technical preview
4 participants