Skip to content

[RFC 0050] Stage 1: Introducing GenAI fields #2465

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 30, 2025
Merged

Conversation

susan-shu-c
Copy link
Member

Overview

This RFC proposes GenAI fields, gen_ai*, with the increase of Generative AI and LLM logging. This will benefit our customers and users, allowing them to monitor and protect their LLM/Generative AI deployments.

Stage 0:

Checklist

  • Have you signed the contributor license agreement?
  • Have you followed the contributor guidelines?
  • For proposing substantial changes or additions to the schema, have you reviewed the RFC process?
  • If submitting code/script changes, have you verified all tests pass locally using make test?
  • If submitting schema/fields updates, have you generated new artifacts by running make and committed those changes?
  • Is your pull request against main? Unless there is a good reason otherwise, we prefer pull requests against main and will backport as needed.
  • Have you added an entry to the CHANGELOG.next.md?

@susan-shu-c
Copy link
Member Author

Looking for feedback on Elastic/ECS data types, I have changed them from stage 0 which had high-level / OTel types

Copy link
Contributor

@peasead peasead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Data types look right.

@susan-shu-c susan-shu-c requested a review from mjwolf April 22, 2025 15:39
@susan-shu-c susan-shu-c merged commit a172882 into main Apr 30, 2025
4 checks passed
@susan-shu-c
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you @trisch-me !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants