Skip to content

update Bullseye to 3.0.0-rc.1 #4081

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2019
Merged

update Bullseye to 3.0.0-rc.1 #4081

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2019

Conversation

adamralph
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@adamralph adamralph mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2019
24 tasks
@adamralph
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mpdreamz FYI this version contains adamralph/bullseye#230

Copy link
Member

@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @adamralph LGTM

leaving this open till I have the cycles to backport this to relevant branches though 😄

@adamralph
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mpdreamz would it help if I sent PR's to those branches? It's in my interest to have the RC being used in anger, so I'm happy to do that for you.

@russcam
Copy link
Contributor

russcam commented Sep 18, 2019

No worries @adamralph, I got it

@russcam russcam merged commit dfb5452 into elastic:master Sep 18, 2019
russcam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2019
russcam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2019
russcam added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2019
(cherry picked from commit dfb5452)
@russcam
Copy link
Contributor

russcam commented Sep 18, 2019

ported to 7.x, 6.x and 5.x

@adamralph adamralph deleted the update-bullseye branch September 18, 2019 05:50
russcam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants