-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
[DOCS] Terms agg doc counts are more precise than documented. #52377
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Pinging @elastic/es-analytics-geo (:Analytics/Aggregations) |
Pinging @elastic/es-docs (>docs) |
Can i work on this one? |
@abprash A PR would be welcome. Thanks. |
Thank you @jrodewig . Working on it. Will submit a PR when done. |
The repro steps were in a private gist, I made it public. |
Thanks @geekpete |
@abprash I'll take a look when time permits. Thanks for raising this! |
…55442) Removes an example from the "Document counts are approximate" section of the terms agg documentation. As #52377 details, the example was no longer accurate in 7.x or 6.8. Document counts were more precise than the example presented. We've opened issue #56025 to discuss re-adding an example later. Co-authored-by: James Rodewig <[email protected]>
…55442) Removes an example from the "Document counts are approximate" section of the terms agg documentation. As #52377 details, the example was no longer accurate in 7.x or 6.8. Document counts were more precise than the example presented. We've opened issue #56025 to discuss re-adding an example later. Co-authored-by: James Rodewig <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: AB Prashanth <[email protected]>
…55442) Removes an example from the "Document counts are approximate" section of the terms agg documentation. As #52377 details, the example was no longer accurate in 7.x or 6.8. Document counts were more precise than the example presented. We've opened issue #56025 to discuss re-adding an example later. Co-authored-by: James Rodewig <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: AB Prashanth <[email protected]>
…55442) Removes an example from the "Document counts are approximate" section of the terms agg documentation. As #52377 details, the example was no longer accurate in 7.x or 6.8. Document counts were more precise than the example presented. We've opened issue #56025 to discuss re-adding an example later. Co-authored-by: James Rodewig <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: AB Prashanth <[email protected]>
…55442) (#56043) Removes an example from the "Document counts are approximate" section of the terms agg documentation. As #52377 details, the example was no longer accurate in 7.x or 6.8. Document counts were more precise than the example presented. We've opened issue #56025 to discuss re-adding an example later. Co-authored-by: James Rodewig <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: AB Prashanth <[email protected]>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The terms aggregation docs include a Document count are approximate section.
When reproduced on 6.8 or 7.x, the actual results are more precise than documented in last table and paragraphs of the section.
Steps to reproduce
https://gist.github.com/geekpete/38c06b2eaf2745c3b7312d329acb01fd
Thanks to @geekpete for raising and putting together the reproduction steps.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: