-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
HLRC XPack Protocol clean up: Licence, Misc #34469
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HLRC XPack Protocol clean up: Licence, Misc #34469
Conversation
Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra |
} | ||
|
||
public void testPutLicense() throws Exception { | ||
// TODO |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can split this into 2 PRs, one for the refactor, and one for the protocol-test stuff. I dont think they are related, either. <3 for the cleanup!!!
|
||
public class XPackUsageRequest extends MasterNodeRequest<XPackUsageRequest> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lolwut... thanks for nothing, git.
@@ -58,7 +55,7 @@ | |||
}); | |||
|
|||
static { | |||
PARSER.declareBoolean(constructorArg(), new ParseField("acknowledged")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i actually dont mind having these defined here if we dont use them anywhere else.
run gradle build tests please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good now, ty for splitting.
thanks @hub-cap for the review |
Move parts related to XPack Licence and Misc from protocol to client
Relates #34451