Skip to content

ML: changing automatic check_window calculation #35643

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

benwtrent
Copy link
Member

Removes unused ML message and changes how the default check_window is calculated.

Relates to: #35131

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/ml-core

Copy link
Contributor

@dimitris-athanasiou dimitris-athanasiou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dimitris-athanasiou
Copy link
Contributor

Didn't check if docs mention anything about how we calculate the default. If they do we need to update that too.

@benwtrent
Copy link
Member Author

@dimitris-athanasiou the docs just mention that we calculate a default, not how it is calculated.

@sophiec20
Copy link
Contributor

Be good for the docs to mention how it is calculated. It's a useful detail.

@benwtrent
Copy link
Member Author

@sophiec20 we don't really do that for our other default calculations. Though I can write something up if it is necessary.

@sophiec20
Copy link
Contributor

we don't really do that for our other default calculations.

We probably should.

@benwtrent benwtrent merged commit bc7dea4 into elastic:master Nov 19, 2018
@benwtrent benwtrent deleted the feature/ml-delayed-data-check-config-fixup branch November 19, 2018 14:03
benwtrent added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2018
* ML: changing automatic check_window calculation

* adding docs on how we calculate the default
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants