-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
Cleanup construction of interceptors #38294
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It would be beneficial to apply some of the request interceptors even when features are disabled. This change reworks the way we build that list so that the interceptors we always want to use are constructed outside of the settings check.
Pinging @elastic/es-security |
jaymode
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/default-distro |
tvernum
added a commit
to tvernum/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2019
It would be beneficial to apply some of the request interceptors even when features are disabled. This change reworks the way we build that list so that the interceptors we always want to use are constructed outside of the settings check. Backport of: elastic#38294
tvernum
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2019
It would be beneficial to apply some of the request interceptors even when features are disabled. This change reworks the way we build that list so that the interceptors we always want to use are constructed outside of the settings check. Backport of: #38294
tvernum
added a commit
to tvernum/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2019
It would be beneficial to apply some of the request interceptors even when features are disabled. This change reworks the way we build that list so that the interceptors we always want to use are constructed outside of the settings check. Backport of: elastic#38294
tvernum
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2019
It would be beneficial to apply some of the request interceptors even when features are disabled. This change reworks the way we build that list so that the interceptors we always want to use are constructed outside of the settings check. Backport of: #38294
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It would be beneficial to apply some of the request interceptors even
when features are disabled. This change reworks the way we build that
list so that the interceptors we always want to use are constructed
outside of the settings check.