Skip to content

Index on rollup.rollup_search.json is a list #39097

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2019

Conversation

Mpdreamz
Copy link
Member

And not a string since it accepts comma separated list of indices.

And not a string since it accepts comma separated list of indices.
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra

@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz requested a review from polyfractal February 19, 2019 09:10
@Mpdreamz
Copy link
Member Author

cc @elastic/es-clients

Copy link
Contributor

@polyfractal polyfractal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed, thanks for the fix @Mpdreamz :)

@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz merged commit cf34d50 into master Mar 4, 2019
Mpdreamz added a commit to Mpdreamz/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2019
And not a string since it accepts comma separated list of indices.

(cherry picked from commit cf34d50)
Mpdreamz added a commit to Mpdreamz/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2019
And not a string since it accepts comma separated list of indices.

(cherry picked from commit cf34d50)
Mpdreamz added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2019
And not a string since it accepts comma separated list of indices.

(cherry picked from commit cf34d50)
Mpdreamz added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2019
And not a string since it accepts comma separated list of indices.

(cherry picked from commit cf34d50)
@colings86 colings86 deleted the fix/rollup-search-rest-spec branch May 27, 2020 07:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants