Expand docs on force-merge and global ordinals #44684
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some small clarifications about force-merging and global ordinals, particularly that global ordinals are cheap on a single-segment index and how this relates to frozen indices. Fixes elastic#41687
DaveCTurner
added
:Distributed Indexing/CRUD
|
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed |
|
Pinging @elastic/es-docs |
jpountz
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2019
|
Thanks @jpountz |
DaveCTurner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2019
Some small clarifications about force-merging and global ordinals, particularly that global ordinals are cheap on a single-segment index and how this relates to frozen indices. Fixes #41687
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some small clarifications about force-merging and global ordinals, particularly
that global ordinals are cheap on a single-segment index and how this relates
to frozen indices.
Fixes #41687