Skip to content

[DOCS] Reformat span within query #44834

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[DOCS] Reformat span within query #44834

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jrodewig
Copy link
Contributor

@jrodewig jrodewig commented Jul 24, 2019

Rewrites the span_within query to use the new query format.

This creates separate sections for the example request and parameters

This is part of #40977, an effort to standardize documentation for query types.

Preview

http://elasticsearch_44834.docs-preview.app.elstc.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/master/query-dsl-span-within-query.html

@cbuescher cbuescher added the >docs General docs changes label Jul 29, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-docs

@jrodewig jrodewig added :Search/Search Search-related issues that do not fall into other categories v7.0.2 v7.1.2 v7.2.2 v7.3.1 v7.4.0 v8.0.0 labels Jul 29, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search

@jrodewig jrodewig marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2019 12:18
@jakelandis jakelandis added v7.3.2 and removed v7.3.1 labels Aug 22, 2019
@colings86 colings86 added v7.5.0 and removed v7.4.0 labels Aug 30, 2019
@polyfractal polyfractal added v7.3.3 and removed v7.3.2 labels Sep 6, 2019
@jrodewig jrodewig closed this Oct 9, 2019
@jrodewig jrodewig deleted the span-within-query branch October 9, 2019 12:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>docs General docs changes :Search/Search Search-related issues that do not fall into other categories
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants