Skip to content

Fix testForceMergeWithSoftDeletesRetentionAndRecoverySource #48766

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2019

Conversation

dnhatn
Copy link
Member

@dnhatn dnhatn commented Oct 31, 2019

This test failure manifests the limitation of the recovery source merge policy explained in #41628. If we already merge down to a single segment then subsequent force merges will be noop although they can prune recovery source. We need to adjust this test until we have a fix for the merge policy.

Relates #41628
Closes #48735

@dnhatn dnhatn added >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests :Distributed Indexing/Engine Anything around managing Lucene and the Translog in an open shard. v8.0.0 v7.5.0 v7.6.0 v6.8.5 v7.4.3 labels Oct 31, 2019
@dnhatn dnhatn requested a review from jpountz October 31, 2019 17:13
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed (:Distributed/Engine)

@dnhatn
Copy link
Member Author

dnhatn commented Nov 1, 2019

Thanks @jpountz.

@dnhatn dnhatn merged commit 3a35929 into elastic:master Nov 1, 2019
@dnhatn dnhatn deleted the fix_prune_source_test branch November 1, 2019 13:41
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2019
This test failure manifests the limitation of the recovery source merge
policy explained in #41628. If we already merge down to a single segment
then subsequent force merges will be noop although they can prune
recovery source. We need to adjust this test until we have a fix for the
merge policy.

Relates #41628
Closes #48735
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2019
This test failure manifests the limitation of the recovery source merge
policy explained in #41628. If we already merge down to a single segment
then subsequent force merges will be noop although they can prune
recovery source. We need to adjust this test until we have a fix for the
merge policy.

Relates #41628
Closes #48735
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2019
This test failure manifests the limitation of the recovery source merge
policy explained in #41628. If we already merge down to a single segment
then subsequent force merges will be noop although they can prune
recovery source. We need to adjust this test until we have a fix for the
merge policy.

Relates #41628
Closes #48735
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2019
This test failure manifests the limitation of the recovery source merge
policy explained in #41628. If we already merge down to a single segment
then subsequent force merges will be noop although they can prune
recovery source. We need to adjust this test until we have a fix for the
merge policy.

Relates #41628
Closes #48735
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed Indexing/Engine Anything around managing Lucene and the Translog in an open shard. >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests v6.8.5 v7.4.3 v7.5.0 v7.6.0 v8.0.0-alpha1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

testForceMergeWithSoftDeletesRetentionAndRecoverySource fails
4 participants