Skip to content

[DOCS] Replaces deprecated ScriptService.ScriptType.INLINE with supported script in Java update docs #49424

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2019

Conversation

szabosteve
Copy link
Contributor

@szabosteve szabosteve commented Nov 21, 2019

This PR updates the Java update API documentation which contains an example snippet with a script type that is claimed to be unsupported.

Related issue: #48790

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-docs (>docs)

@szabosteve szabosteve requested a review from jrodewig November 21, 2019 15:19
Copy link
Contributor

@jrodewig jrodewig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks!

@szabosteve szabosteve merged commit 56d97dc into elastic:7.x Nov 22, 2019
@szabosteve szabosteve deleted the 7.x.fix.java.up branch November 22, 2019 13:17
szabosteve added a commit to szabosteve/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2019
szabosteve added a commit to szabosteve/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2019
szabosteve added a commit to szabosteve/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2019
szabosteve added a commit to szabosteve/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2019
szabosteve added a commit to szabosteve/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2019
szabosteve added a commit to szabosteve/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2019
@szabosteve
Copy link
Contributor Author

Backported down to 7.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants