Skip to content

Migrate some of the Docker tests from old repository #49792

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

pugnascotia
Copy link
Contributor

Backport of #49079. Reimplement a number of the tests from
elastic/elasticsearch-docker.

There is also one Docker image fix here, which is that two of the provided
config files had different file permissions to the rest. I've fixed this
with another RUN chmod while building the image, and adjusted the
corresponding packaging test.

Backport of elastic#49079. Reimplement a number of the tests from
elastic/elasticsearch-docker.

There is also one Docker image fix here, which is that two of the provided
config files had different file permissions to the rest. I've fixed this
with another RUN chmod while building the image, and adjusted the
corresponding packaging test.
@pugnascotia pugnascotia added :Delivery/Packaging RPM and deb packaging, tar and zip archives, shell and batch scripts backport v7.6.0 labels Dec 3, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra (:Core/Infra/Packaging)

@pugnascotia
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/packaging-matrix

@pugnascotia pugnascotia merged commit 1bc3e69 into elastic:7.x Dec 4, 2019
@pugnascotia pugnascotia deleted the migrate-docker-tests-from-old-repo-7x branch December 4, 2019 08:58
@mark-vieira mark-vieira added the Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team label Nov 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport :Delivery/Packaging RPM and deb packaging, tar and zip archives, shell and batch scripts Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team v7.6.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants