Skip to content

Use TransportChannel in TransportHandshaker #54684

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

Tim-Brooks
Copy link
Contributor

Currently the TransportHandshaker has a specialized codepath for sending
a response. In other work, we are going to start having handshakes
contribute to circuit breaking (while not being breakable). This commit
moves in that direction by allowing the handshaker to responding using a
standard TcpTransportChannel similar to other requests.

Currently the TransportHandshaker has a specialized codepath for sending
a response. In other work, we are going to start having handshakes
contribute to circuit breaking (while not being breakable). This commit
moves in that direction by allowing the handshaker to responding using a
standard TcpTransportChannel similar to other requests.
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed (:Distributed/Network)

Copy link
Contributor

@ywelsch ywelsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Tim-Brooks Tim-Brooks merged commit 2c5951a into elastic:master Apr 3, 2020
Tim-Brooks added a commit to Tim-Brooks/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2020
Currently the TransportHandshaker has a specialized codepath for sending
a response. In other work, we are going to start having handshakes
contribute to circuit breaking (while not being breakable). This commit
moves in that direction by allowing the handshaker to responding using a
standard TcpTransportChannel similar to other requests.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants