-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
Fix security manager bug writing large blobs to GCS #55421
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jasontedor
merged 3 commits into
elastic:master
from
jasontedor:repository-gcs-permissions-issue
Apr 17, 2020
Merged
Fix security manager bug writing large blobs to GCS #55421
jasontedor
merged 3 commits into
elastic:master
from
jasontedor:repository-gcs-permissions-issue
Apr 17, 2020
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit addresses a security manager permissions issue writing large blobs (on the resumable upload path) to GCS. The underlying issue here is that we need to wrap the close and write calls on the channel. It is not enough to do this: SocketAccess.doPrivilegedVoidIOException( () -> Streams.copy( inputStream, Channels.newOutputStream(client().writer(blobInfo, writeOptions)))); This reason that this is not enough is because Streams#copy will be in the stacktrace and it is not granted the security manager permissions needed to close or write this channel. We only grant those permissions to classes loaded in the plugin classloader, and Streams#copy is from the parent classloader. This is why we must wrap the close and write calls as privileged, to truncate the Streams#copy call out of the stacktrace. The reason that this issue is not caught in testing is because the size of data that we use in testing is too small to trigger the large blob resumable upload path. Therefore, we address this by adding a system property to control the threshold, which we can then set in tests to exercise this code path. Prior to rewriting the writeBlobResumable method to wrap the close and write calls as privileged, with this additional test, we are able to reproduce the security manager permissions issue. After adding the wrapping, this test now passes.
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed (:Distributed/Snapshot/Restore) |
Here is a stacktrace that shows the issue
|
rjernst
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
...sitory-gcs/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/repositories/gcs/GoogleCloudStorageBlobStore.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jasontedor
added a commit
to jasontedor/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2020
* Fix security manager bug writing large blobs to GCS This commit addresses a security manager permissions issue writing large blobs (on the resumable upload path) to GCS. The underlying issue here is that we need to wrap the close and write calls on the channel. It is not enough to do this: SocketAccess.doPrivilegedVoidIOException( () -> Streams.copy( inputStream, Channels.newOutputStream(client().writer(blobInfo, writeOptions)))); This reason that this is not enough is because Streams#copy will be in the stacktrace and it is not granted the security manager permissions needed to close or write this channel. We only grant those permissions to classes loaded in the plugin classloader, and Streams#copy is from the parent classloader. This is why we must wrap the close and write calls as privileged, to truncate the Streams#copy call out of the stacktrace. The reason that this issue is not caught in testing is because the size of data that we use in testing is too small to trigger the large blob resumable upload path. Therefore, we address this by adding a system property to control the threshold, which we can then set in tests to exercise this code path. Prior to rewriting the writeBlobResumable method to wrap the close and write calls as privileged, with this additional test, we are able to reproduce the security manager permissions issue. After adding the wrapping, this test now passes. * Fix forbidden APIs issue * Remove leftover debugging
jasontedor
added a commit
to jasontedor/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2020
* Fix security manager bug writing large blobs to GCS This commit addresses a security manager permissions issue writing large blobs (on the resumable upload path) to GCS. The underlying issue here is that we need to wrap the close and write calls on the channel. It is not enough to do this: SocketAccess.doPrivilegedVoidIOException( () -> Streams.copy( inputStream, Channels.newOutputStream(client().writer(blobInfo, writeOptions)))); This reason that this is not enough is because Streams#copy will be in the stacktrace and it is not granted the security manager permissions needed to close or write this channel. We only grant those permissions to classes loaded in the plugin classloader, and Streams#copy is from the parent classloader. This is why we must wrap the close and write calls as privileged, to truncate the Streams#copy call out of the stacktrace. The reason that this issue is not caught in testing is because the size of data that we use in testing is too small to trigger the large blob resumable upload path. Therefore, we address this by adding a system property to control the threshold, which we can then set in tests to exercise this code path. Prior to rewriting the writeBlobResumable method to wrap the close and write calls as privileged, with this additional test, we are able to reproduce the security manager permissions issue. After adding the wrapping, this test now passes. * Fix forbidden APIs issue * Remove leftover debugging
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
blocker
:Distributed Coordination/Snapshot/Restore
Anything directly related to the `_snapshot/*` APIs
>non-issue
v7.7.0
v7.8.0
v8.0.0-alpha1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit addresses a security manager permissions issue writing large blobs (on the resumable upload path) to GCS. The underlying issue here is that we need to wrap the close and write calls on the channel. It is not enough to do this:
This reason that this is not enough is because Streams#copy will be in the stacktrace and it is not granted the security manager permissions needed to close or write this channel. We only grant those permissions to classes loaded in the plugin classloader, and Streams#copy is from the parent classloader. This is why we must wrap the close and write calls as privileged, to truncate the Streams#copy call out of the stacktrace.
The reason that this issue is not caught in testing is because the size of data that we use in testing is too small to trigger the large blob resumable upload path. Therefore, we address this by adding a system property to control the threshold, which we can then set in tests to exercise this code path. Prior to rewriting the writeBlobResumable method to wrap the close and write calls as privileged, with this additional test, we are able to reproduce the security manager permissions issue. After adding the wrapping, this test now passes.
Relates #51596