Skip to content

Percolator keyword fields should not store norms #58899

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 2, 2020

Conversation

romseygeek
Copy link
Contributor

The refactoring in #57666 inadvertently enabled norms on two of the percolator subfields,
leading to an increase in memory usage. This commit disables norms on these fields again.

@romseygeek romseygeek added >non-issue :Search Relevance/Percolator Reverse search: find queries that match a document v8.0.0 v7.9.0 labels Jul 2, 2020
@romseygeek romseygeek self-assigned this Jul 2, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search (:Search/Percolator)

@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Search Meta label for search team label Jul 2, 2020
@romseygeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Marked as a non-issue because unreleased.

Copy link
Contributor

@jimczi jimczi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@romseygeek romseygeek merged commit 6734440 into elastic:master Jul 2, 2020
@romseygeek romseygeek deleted the bug/binary-norms branch July 2, 2020 12:59
romseygeek added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2020
The refactoring in #57666 inadvertently enabled norms on two of the percolator subfields,
leading to an increase in memory usage. This commit disables norms on these fields again.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>non-issue :Search Relevance/Percolator Reverse search: find queries that match a document Team:Search Meta label for search team v7.9.0 v8.0.0-alpha1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants