Skip to content

[DOCS] Document dynamic circuit breaker settings #61334

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2020
Merged

[DOCS] Document dynamic circuit breaker settings #61334

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2020

Conversation

jrodewig
Copy link
Contributor

Updates circuit breaker docs to indicate whether settings
are static or dynamic.

@jrodewig jrodewig added >docs General docs changes :Core/Infra/Circuit Breakers Track estimates of memory consumption to prevent overload v8.0.0 v7.10.0 v7.9.1 labels Aug 19, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra (:Core/Infra/Circuit Breakers)

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-docs (>docs)

@elasticmachine elasticmachine added Team:Docs Meta label for docs team Team:Core/Infra Meta label for core/infra team labels Aug 19, 2020
Copy link
Member

@danielmitterdorfer danielmitterdorfer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jrodewig
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @danielmitterdorfer

@jrodewig jrodewig merged commit 8359232 into elastic:master Aug 19, 2020
@jrodewig jrodewig deleted the docs__doc-dynamic-circuit-breakers branch August 19, 2020 14:58
@danielmitterdorfer
Copy link
Member

You're welcome. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Core/Infra/Circuit Breakers Track estimates of memory consumption to prevent overload >docs General docs changes Team:Core/Infra Meta label for core/infra team Team:Docs Meta label for docs team v7.9.1 v7.10.0 v8.0.0-alpha1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants