Skip to content

Minor FlatObjectFieldMapper fix #62633

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

javanna
Copy link
Member

@javanna javanna commented Sep 18, 2020

The splitQueriesOnWhitespace instance field can be made final, and setter and getter are not always needed.

The splitQueriesOnWhitespace instance field can be made final, and setter and getter are not always needed.
@javanna javanna added >non-issue :Search Foundations/Mapping Index mappings, including merging and defining field types v8.0.0 v7.10.0 labels Sep 18, 2020
@javanna javanna requested a review from romseygeek September 18, 2020 14:11
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search (:Search/Mapping)

@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Search Meta label for search team label Sep 18, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@romseygeek romseygeek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thansk @javanna !

@javanna javanna merged commit 36bc6f7 into elastic:master Sep 18, 2020
javanna added a commit to javanna/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2020
The splitQueriesOnWhitespace instance field can be made final, and setter and getter are not always needed.
javanna added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2020
The splitQueriesOnWhitespace instance field can be made final, and setter and getter are not always needed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>non-issue :Search Foundations/Mapping Index mappings, including merging and defining field types Team:Search Meta label for search team v7.10.0 v8.0.0-alpha1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants