Skip to content

disable BWC tests that will fail with the new include/exclude work #64025

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

not-napoleon
Copy link
Member

relates to #64014

This disables the BWC tests that will break when I merge that backport. Once the backport lands, I'll update the version constants in master and re-enable these tests.

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-analytics-geo (:Analytics/Aggregations)

@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) label Oct 21, 2020
Copy link
Member

@nik9000 nik9000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. This is the kind of thing I think is safe to merge without a review once you are comfortable with the process.

@not-napoleon not-napoleon merged commit dc073d2 into elastic:master Oct 27, 2020
@not-napoleon not-napoleon deleted the disable-bwc-for-terms-family branch October 27, 2020 13:43
not-napoleon added a commit to not-napoleon/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2020
not-napoleon added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2020
* Revert "disable BWC tests that will fail with the new include/exclude work (#64025)"

This reverts commit dc073d2.

* fix version number for BWC

Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Analytics/Aggregations Aggregations >non-issue Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants