Skip to content

[ML] Sync changelogs between 8.4 and main #89377

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 16, 2022

Conversation

droberts195
Copy link
Contributor

Copies a few changelog edits from the 8.4 branch into main so that
people looking at the main branch see the same docs as people
looking at 8.4.

Relates #89078
Relates #89286
Relates #89376

szabosteve and others added 3 commits August 16, 2022 10:10
The frequent_items aggregation is experimental in 8.4, and we
want to gain confidence in it for internal use cases before
publicising more widely, so we'll just give it a single bullet
point release note rather than a whole section in the release
highlights.
@droberts195 droberts195 added >docs General docs changes :ml Machine learning v8.5.0 labels Aug 16, 2022
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added Team:Docs Meta label for docs team Team:ML Meta label for the ML team labels Aug 16, 2022
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/ml-core (Team:ML)

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-docs (Team:Docs)

Copy link
Contributor

@dimitris-athanasiou dimitris-athanasiou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@droberts195 droberts195 merged commit f87ce07 into elastic:main Aug 16, 2022
@droberts195 droberts195 deleted the sync_changelogs branch August 16, 2022 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>docs General docs changes :ml Machine learning Team:Docs Meta label for docs team Team:ML Meta label for the ML team v8.5.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants