Skip to content

make test failed #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
miaout17 opened this issue Feb 19, 2011 · 3 comments
Closed

make test failed #2

miaout17 opened this issue Feb 19, 2011 · 3 comments

Comments

@miaout17
Copy link
Contributor

I found that unit test failed since de49179.

The error message is:

{"init terminating in do_boot",{{yecc_bug,"1.3",{missing_state_in_action_table,294}},[{elixir_parser,yeccpars2,7},{elixir_parser,yeccpars0,5},{elixir_transform,forms,3},{elixir_transform,parse_and_transform,3},{elixir,parse,3},{elixir,eval,3},{lists,foreach,2},{test_helper,test,0}]}}

510a79a is the last good commit.
@miaout17
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oops, as mentioned in Erlang Forum, I think it might be a bug of Erlang R13.

I will try Erlang R14B later.

@miaout17
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, Erlang R14B works. It's really a bug of Erlang R13.

I think the minimum requirement is Erlang R14A, and It's nice to be documented in README.

@miaout17
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated README, Issue closed

@alco alco mentioned this issue Apr 1, 2012
Closed
@yrashk yrashk mentioned this issue Jun 10, 2012
Closed
@yrashk yrashk mentioned this issue Oct 27, 2012
Closed
@pma pma mentioned this issue Mar 29, 2014
Closed
@tinglei8 tinglei8 mentioned this issue Mar 23, 2016
Closed
@eksperimental eksperimental mentioned this issue Apr 7, 2016
Merged
@nbw nbw mentioned this issue Oct 11, 2017
Merged
@josevalim josevalim mentioned this issue Dec 18, 2017
Closed
@dmilith dmilith mentioned this issue Jun 19, 2023
Closed
@davydog187 davydog187 mentioned this issue Aug 6, 2023
Merged
josevalim added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2024
@josevalim
Optimize reversing logic
f01dc17 
Rule #1:

    Enum.reverse([1, 2, 3]) ++ [4, 5, 6]

is equivalent but slower than

    Enum.reverse([1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6])

Rule #2:

    Enum.reverse([1, 2, 3] ++ [4, 5, 6])

is equivalent but slower than:

    Enum.reverse([4, 5, 6], Enum.reverse([1, 2, 3]))

Rule #3

    Enum.reverse(Enum.reverse([1, 2, 3]))

is the same as:

    [1, 2, 3]
wingyplus added a commit to wingyplus/elixir that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2024
@wingyplus
Investigate bugs elixir-lang#2
38f8861 
Signed-off-by: Thanabodee Charoenpiriyakij <[email protected]>
@josevalim josevalim mentioned this issue Apr 1, 2025
Open
4 tasks
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@miaout17