Skip to content

1.39.16 #503

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 15, 2020
Merged

1.39.16 #503

merged 4 commits into from
May 15, 2020

Conversation

sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbc100 sbc100 commented May 14, 2020

No description provided.

@sbc100 sbc100 requested a review from kripken May 15, 2020 02:51
# The emsdk ships all system libraries so we don't expect to see any
# cache population unless we explicly --clear-cache.
test_build('', expected=False)
check_call(emcc + ' --clear-cache')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is maybe excessive - CI here will wait on building all of libc. maybe just delete say libdlmalloc?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The problem is that each version of SDK now has it own cache... so I'd need to figure out where each libc is. For the upstream SDK I know this because of EM_CACHE, but for fastcomp I'd need to derive the cache directory somehow.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, how about removing fastcomp cache testing then?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.. although building libc only takes less than a minute, no? Does it it matter on the emsdk CI?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a big deal, yeah. But it's nice if emsdk CI is fast as we want to avoid anything landing on emscripten while we tag. lgtm either way though.

"releases": {
"1.39.16": "701922c0d4a47ad6bc39bd72f083813a71be4ea7",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

more stuff landed in emscripten meanwhile, so we need to update this

@kripken kripken merged commit 85cf370 into master May 15, 2020
@kripken kripken deleted the new_release branch May 15, 2020 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants