Skip to content

Espressif SDK 1.5.2 released #1653

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
osos opened this issue Feb 19, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed

Espressif SDK 1.5.2 released #1653

osos opened this issue Feb 19, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@osos
Copy link

osos commented Feb 19, 2016

http://bbs.espressif.com/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=850

Might be worth to include in the upcoming 2.1.0 release of esp8266-arduino?

@andig
Copy link
Contributor

andig commented Feb 20, 2016

Would be great if we were able to recompile lwip, too? Imho higher priority than sdk version bump?

Corresponding lwip sources are at http://bbs.espressif.com/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=1913

@andig
Copy link
Contributor

andig commented Apr 3, 2016

from gitter:

to use (gcc lwip) instead of Espressif-provided one, you need to replace -llwip with -llwip_gcc in platform.txt, and restart the IDE.

@kaeferfreund
Copy link

@andig
thx for the advice. Is there any obvious advantage with that?

@andig
Copy link
Contributor

andig commented Apr 3, 2016

thx for the advice. Is there any obvious advantage with that?

Not unless you're debugging and get stuck when the code touches the lwip internals.

@andig
Copy link
Contributor

andig commented Apr 6, 2016

Quick note here- async web server is running rock stable with sdk 1.5.2 according to my tests. The ugly crashes have been fixed thanks to @igrr and the insights from lwip.

@kaeferfreund
Copy link

are you referring to your fork or me-no-devs version?

@andig
Copy link
Contributor

andig commented Apr 6, 2016

me-no-dev plus the open pr on the webserver for handling lowmem.

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Manuel [email protected] wrote:

are you referring to your fork or me-no-devs version?


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1653 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants