Remove broken ltoa/ultoa, call itoa/utoa #5625
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Use the newlib integer-to-ASCII non-POSIX calls instead of rolling our own. Should be safe as sizeof(long) == sizeof(int). The custom functions behaved differently from itoa when passed in negative values in non-base-10. Fixes bug esp8266#2813
earlephilhower
force-pushed
the
itoaltoa
branch
from
967dab3 to
4b875e1
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use the newlib integer-to-ASCII non-POSIX calls instead of rolling
our own. Should be safe as sizeof(long) == sizeof(int).
The custom functions behaved differently from itoa when passed in
negative values in non-base-10.
Fixes bug #2813