Skip to content

Add params to most op-conductor RPC examples #1174

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

dpulitano
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The RPC specs for op-conductor do not include placeholders for the required parameters in most examples. This PR adds them for almost all of them + updates the names of some to better clarify what they stand for.

Note that conductor_commitUnsafePayload still requires an update because I don't have experience testing this (nor a need to).

Tests

Tested all RPCs for which the signatures were modified

@dpulitano dpulitano requested a review from a team as a code owner December 11, 2024 19:21
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 22ec185
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/6759e649a2fa5100080940d7
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1174--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant updates to the documentation of the op-conductor service, specifically targeting the RPC method parameters. The modifications include renaming parameters for methods that add servers as voters and non-voters, as well as for removing a server from the cluster. The new parameters explicitly require <raft-server-id>, <raft-consensus-addr>, and <raft-config-version>, replacing more generic terminology. Additionally, the description of the conductor_transferLeader method has been refined to clarify that it resigns leadership when transferring to another server. The documentation emphasizes the critical role of the raft-server-id in various RPC calls, ensuring users understand its necessity within the Raft consensus algorithm. The overall structure of the document, including sections on setup, configuration options, and next steps, remains unchanged, allowing users to follow the guide effectively despite the updates aimed at enhancing clarity and precision in RPC interactions.

Possibly related PRs

  • Improve op-conductor docs. #796: This PR improves the documentation for the op-conductor, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding RPC method parameters and overall clarity in the documentation.
  • adding op-conductor documentation #818: This PR adds documentation for the op-conductor, which aligns with the main PR's focus on enhancing the clarity and usability of the op-conductor service documentation.
  • small fixes to op-conductor page #990: This PR includes updates to the op-conductor documentation, specifically addressing method signatures and clarifying operational procedures, which are relevant to the changes in the main PR.
  • Update RPC ports in op-conductor.mdx examples #1170: This PR updates the RPC ports in the op-conductor documentation, which is directly related to the changes in the main PR that also focus on RPC method parameters and their documentation.

Suggested reviewers

  • cpengilly
  • bradleycamacho

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
pages/builders/chain-operators/tools/op-conductor.mdx (6)

547-547: Parameter placeholders need descriptions

The parameters <raft-server-id>, <raft-consensus-addr>, and <raft-config-version> should be documented with their expected types and formats.

Consider adding a parameter description section:

AddServerAsVoter adds a server as a voter to the cluster. 

+Parameters:
+- `raft-server-id`: Unique identifier for the server in the Raft cluster
+- `raft-consensus-addr`: Network address for Raft consensus communication
+- `raft-config-version`: Version number of the Raft configuration

Also applies to: 554-554


572-572: Maintain consistent parameter documentation

Similar to conductor_addServerAsVoter, the parameters for conductor_addServerAsNonvoter should be documented.

Consider adding parameter descriptions here as well:

AddServerAsNonvoter adds a server as a non-voter to the cluster. non-voter
The non-voter will not participate in the leader election.

+Parameters:
+- `raft-server-id`: Unique identifier for the server in the Raft cluster
+- `raft-consensus-addr`: Network address for Raft consensus communication
+- `raft-config-version`: Version number of the Raft configuration

Also applies to: 579-579


596-596: Document reduced parameter set

The conductor_removeServer method uses fewer parameters than the add methods. This difference should be explained.

Consider adding parameter descriptions:

RemoveServer removes a server from the cluster.

+Parameters:
+- `raft-server-id`: Unique identifier for the server to remove
+- `raft-config-version`: Version number of the Raft configuration

Also applies to: 603-603


614-614: Clarify leadership transfer behavior

The updated description better explains the behavior but could be more precise about the implications.

Consider expanding the description:

-TransferLeader transfers leadership to another server (resigns).
+TransferLeader resigns leadership, allowing another server in the cluster to become leader through the standard Raft election process.

644-644: Document directed leadership transfer parameters

The conductor_transferLeaderToServer parameters should be documented to explain their role in the directed transfer.

Consider adding parameter descriptions:

TransferLeaderToServer transfers leadership to a specific server.

+Parameters:
+- `raft-server-id`: Unique identifier for the target leader server
+- `raft-consensus-addr`: Network address of the target leader
+- `raft-config-version`: Version number of the Raft configuration

Also applies to: 651-651


707-707: Address TODO comment for conductor_commitUnsafePayload

The TODO comment indicates missing parameter documentation for this critical RPC method.

Would you like me to help create comprehensive documentation for the conductor_commitUnsafePayload method's parameters? I can open a GitHub issue to track this task.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83417c3 and 22ec185.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/builders/chain-operators/tools/op-conductor.mdx (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/builders/chain-operators/tools/op-conductor.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "

Copy link
Collaborator

@sbvegan sbvegan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome, thank you for improving our docs!

@sbvegan sbvegan merged commit 1de8974 into ethereum-optimism:main Dec 23, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants