docs: Remove duplicated op-batcher replacing with op-deployer

[posaune0423]

Description

I found a small typo while reading the documentation, so I quickly created a PR which replace duplicated op-batcher with correct word op-deployer in architecture page 👇🏻

ref: https://docs.optimism.io/builders/chain-operators/architecture#op-batcher-1

Tests

Additional context

Metadata

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	70fe11f
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67889c650d0a240008132783
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1248--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a documentation update in the pages/builders/chain-operators/architecture.mdx file, specifically focusing on the section about the OP Stack architecture. The key change is renaming the "op-batcher" section to "op-deployer", reflecting a shift in focus from a batching service to a deployment tool. The new content emphasizes the op-deployer's role in deploying standardized OP Stack chains that comply with Superchain specifications. The documentation now highlights the tool's ability to compare a chain's current state with its intended configuration and make necessary adjustments during deployment.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Deployer as op-deployer
    participant Chain as OP Stack Chain
    participant Contracts as Superchain Contracts

    Deployer->>Chain: Assess Current Configuration
    Deployer->>Contracts: Compare with Intended State
    Deployer->>Chain: Apply Necessary Adjustments
    Deployer->>Contracts: Ensure Superchain Compliance

Loading

Possibly related issues

• [2024 Q4 Audit] builders/chain-operators/deploy/overview.md #991: Directly related to updating documentation about OP Stack chain deployment, with specific recommendations that align with this PR's changes.

Possibly related PRs

• op-deployer + opcm documentation #934: Introduces documentation for the op-deployer
• adding op-deployer callouts #1016: Adds callouts directing users to the op-deployer
• Update chain deployment overview page #1241: Updates OP Stack deployment overview page

Suggested reviewers

• krofax
• sbvegan

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b81bdc and 70fe11f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• pages/builders/chain-operators/architecture.mdx (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

pages/builders/chain-operators/architecture.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

• Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
• Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
• Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
• Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
• Apply the Oxford comma.
• Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
• Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
• For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
  1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
  2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
  3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
• Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
• When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
  "

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)

• GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
• GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
• GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism

🔇 Additional comments (1)

pages/builders/chain-operators/architecture.mdx (1)

Line range hint 48-52: Verify the impact of removing the "op-batcher" section.

The "op-batcher" section has been removed, but there are still references to it in other parts of the document:

1. In the "Permissioned components" section
2. In the "Sequencer" section
3. In the component diagram

Please ensure these references are updated or verify if they should be preserved.

Run this script to find all references to "op-batcher":

✅ Verification successful

The removal of the "op-batcher" section is safe and doesn't create documentation gaps

The removed section was part of a high-level architectural overview, but detailed information about op-batcher is well-maintained throughout the documentation, including deployment guides, configuration details, and troubleshooting information. The removal doesn't create any inconsistencies or missing information.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all references to "op-batcher" in the documentation
rg -i "op-batcher" --type mdx

Length of output: 57

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all .mdx files and search for "op-batcher" with context
fd -e mdx -x rg -i "op-batcher" -C 2 {}

Length of output: 8418

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.