Skip to content

Remove OP_BATCHER_THROTTLE_INTERVAL #1420

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2025
Merged

Remove OP_BATCHER_THROTTLE_INTERVAL #1420

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2025

Conversation

bradleycamacho
Copy link
Member

Removes mentions of OP_BATCHER_THROTTLE_INTERVAL and instead recommends altering OP_BATCHER_THROTTLE_THRESHOLD when one wants to disable throttling

@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho requested a review from a team as a code owner February 27, 2025 00:36
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit bdb148c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67bfb38216929a0008b14c6f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1420--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 27, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes update the batcher configuration documentation by correcting a spelling error and clarifying the throttling options. Specifically, the description for the --throttle-threshold flag now explicitly states that setting its value to 0 disables throttling. Additionally, the bullet point and associated details for the --throttle-interval flag have been removed. The overall structure remains unchanged, retaining the other sections related to throttling parameters.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sbvegan
  • krofax

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pages/operators/chain-operators/configuration/batcher.mdx (1)

1-5: Missing Required Metadata in Frontmatter

The frontmatter currently includes only the title, language, and description. According to the documentation guidelines for regular pages, additional metadata fields such as topic, personas, categories, and content_type should be present and non-empty. Please update the frontmatter accordingly.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e44647e and bdb148c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/operators/chain-operators/configuration/batcher.mdx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with ...

**/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • First, check the frontmatter section at the top of the file:
    1. For regular pages, ensure ALL these fields are present and not empty:
    ---
    title: [non-empty]
    lang: [non-empty]
    description: [non-empty]
    topic: [non-empty]
    personas: [non-empty array]
    categories: [non-empty array]
    content_type: [valid type]
    ---
    1. For landing pages (index.mdx or files with ), only these fields are required:
    ---
    title: [non-empty]
    lang: [non-empty]
    description: [non-empty]
    topic: [non-empty]
    ---
    1. If any required fields are missing or empty, comment:
      'This file appears to be missing required metadata. You can fix this by running:
    pnpm metadata-batch-cli:dry "path/to/this/file.mdx"
    Review the changes, then run without :dry to apply them.'
  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
  • pages/operators/chain-operators/configuration/batcher.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pages/operators/chain-operators/configuration/batcher.mdx (2)

117-117: Updated Introduction for Throttling Flags

The new introductory sentence—"The batcher can be configured with the following new flags and default parameters:"—clearly prepares the reader for the list of configuration options. This update appropriately aligns with the removal of the OP_BATCHER_THROTTLE_INTERVAL parameter.


119-120: Clarification on Throttle Threshold

The revised bullet for the throttle-threshold flag now clearly explains that a backlog value of 1,000,000 enables throttling and that setting this flag to 0 disables throttling. This change fulfills the objective of removing references to OP_BATCHER_THROTTLE_INTERVAL and streamlines the explanation about controlling throttling via OP_BATCHER_THROTTLE_THRESHOLD.

Copy link
Collaborator

@sbvegan sbvegan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice, can you remind to run comms on the batcher tomorrow? Slack is finally back, but I want to send a message when people are online

@geoknee
Copy link
Contributor

geoknee commented Feb 27, 2025

Is it worth calling out that the way the config works changed in release v1.11.2?

We could have a little box that describes the old behaviour, and keep that around until we are sure everyone will have updated?

@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho merged commit b16c539 into main Feb 27, 2025
8 checks passed
@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho deleted the op-batcher branch February 27, 2025 15:39
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request May 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants