Best practice cleanup #1476
Best practice cleanup #1476
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe documentation update clarifies the best practices for versioning and release notes of the OP Stack’s off-chain components. The content has been rephrased and restructured to distinctly outline the guidelines for production releases, monorepo releases, contracts releases, and Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
pages/operators/chain-operators/management/best-practices.mdx (1)
1-5:⚠️ Potential issueMissing Required Frontmatter Metadata
The frontmatter is missing several required fields for a regular page (e.g.,
topic,personas,categories, andcontent_type). Please update the metadata accordingly. You can fix this by running:pnpm metadata-batch-cli:dry "pages/operators/chain-operators/management/best-practices.mdx"
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
pages/operators/chain-operators/management/best-practices.mdx (4)
16-31: Clear Guidance on Release VersioningThe revised section now clearly distinguishes the different release types—production, monorepo, contracts, and
op-geth—with helpful examples and GitHub links.
Note: Static analysis flagged a potential duplication in the phrase "for the" within the bullet point examples (lines 25–26). Consider rephrasing these examples to avoid repetition.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~25-~25: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably use “for the” only once.
Context: ..., for example: *op-node/v1.7.5for theop-node*op-challenger/v1.0.0for theop-challenger* **Monorepo release...(PHRASE_REPETITION)
50-53: Refine Incremental Upgrade Rollouts DescriptionThe explanation of staggered upgrades is informative; however, consider shortening or rephrasing the latter sentence (e.g., "Ensure nodes are upgraded gradually, confirming stability before proceeding with each change") for stronger impact.
56-60: Clear Recommendation for Sequencer IsolationThe updated section on isolating the sequencer node is clear and actionable. A minor check on article usage or punctuation may further polish the text, but overall it effectively details the benefits of handling ingress traffic behind a proxy.
63-64: Header Enhancement for Peer-to-Peer TransactionsConsider revising the header to “Improve the reliability of peer-to-peer transactions” to slightly enhance clarity and parallelism with other sections. The supporting text is clear.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~63-~63: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...he transactions internally. ## Improve reliability of peer-to-peer transactions These fla...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/operators/chain-operators/management/best-practices.mdx(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with ...
**/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- First, check the frontmatter section at the top of the file:
- For regular pages, ensure ALL these fields are present and not empty:
--- title: [non-empty] lang: [non-empty] description: [non-empty] topic: [non-empty] personas: [non-empty array] categories: [non-empty array] content_type: [valid type] ---
- For landing pages (index.mdx or files with ), only these fields are required:
--- title: [non-empty] lang: [non-empty] description: [non-empty] topic: [non-empty] ---
- If any required fields are missing or empty, comment:
'This file appears to be missing required metadata. You can fix this by running:Review the changes, then run without :dry to apply them.'pnpm metadata-batch-cli:dry "path/to/this/file.mdx"- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
pages/operators/chain-operators/management/best-practices.mdx
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/operators/chain-operators/management/best-practices.mdx
[grammar] ~25-~25: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably use “for the” only once.
Context: ..., for example: * op-node/v1.7.5 for the op-node * op-challenger/v1.0.0 for the op-challenger * **Monorepo release...
(PHRASE_REPETITION)
[style] ~54-~54: Consider shortening or rephrasing this to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ensuring things work as expected before making changes to every node. ## Isolate your sequencer ...
(MAKE_CHANGES)
[uncategorized] ~63-~63: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...he transactions internally. ## Improve reliability of peer-to-peer transactions These fla...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
- GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pages/operators/chain-operators/management/best-practices.mdx (3)
43-43: Improved Deployment File ClarityAdding "and passed to the deployment script when you deployed the contracts" improves the clarity of the deployment configuration file’s role.
45-47: Enhanced Deployment Artifacts DetailsThe updated description for the deployment directory and rollup configuration file provides clearer guidance on where to locate smart contract artifacts, which benefits operators during audits or troubleshooting.
91-95: Well-Defined Assumption Regarding Archive ModeThe note that the
op-proposerassumesop-gethis run in archive mode is clear and appropriately warns that this behavior may change in future network upgrades.
|
@richardgreg This looks REALLY good!! Just a few structural comments and then I'll approve! |
|
@bradleycamacho thanks. Do you have a specific comment in mind? |
Description
Reorganized and clarified how monorepo releases differ from component-specific releases
Tests
Additional context
Metadata
closes #994