Initial docusaurus setup #5229
Closed
Initial docusaurus setup #5229
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
update ma' fork
This commit runs the `npx docusaurus-init` command, cleans away some files that are irrelevant to this project (blogs etc), and sets up a very basic structure of documentation files.
|
Do you think you could redo these changes on top of #5227? That would also make it clearer which features you removed etc — which would be helpful to me as a maintainer to know. |
|
yeah sure :) |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following up on #5209, this pull request bootstraps a documentation page with Docusaurus.
In addition to running
npx docusaurus-init, this pull request cleans up a bit of boilerplate, removes some features not required by this project (the blog, in particular), and starts setting up the documentation structure.I noticed that #5227 was submitted while I was working on this - it was not my intention to basically re-do @amyrlam 's efforts (sorry about that).
However, seeing that this includes a tiny bit more work than #5227, I decided to submit it either way.
I'd love to continue contributing to this effort - either alone or with anyone willing to pitch in :)