chore: Replace zod by protobufjs

[jerive]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

[jerive]

Two issues pending

1. Conversion from JSON fails for google.protobuf.Timestamp types (kind of expected, string != {seconds, nanos}) => the UI ends up needing a protobuf binary instead of the JSON string that is exposed today by the backend (unless we find a way to do automatic conversion, which I have not found yet how to do ; we could do regex search/replace but it does not feel like the right way 🙂 )
2. I have not found a proto equivalent for featureViewSummaryStatistics and I am still figuring out what to do. Certainly you know better than I do

Except for these two issues, the UI works like a charm with the new protobufjs parsers

[adchia]

Looks like there's still some outstanding issues in showing enum values (e.g. data source enum types)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 67.71% // Head: 57.93% // Decreases project coverage by -9.77% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (408bd9c) compared to base (6bc91c2).
Patch coverage: 0.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3208      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.71%   57.93%   -9.78%     
==========================================
  Files         181      215      +34     
  Lines       16615    18062    +1447     
==========================================
- Hits        11251    10465     -786     
- Misses       5364     7597    +2233     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	?
unittests	57.93% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
sdk/python/feast/ui_server.py	23.91% <0.00%> (ø)
...sts/integration/registration/test_universal_cli.py	20.20% <0.00%> (-79.80%)	⬇️
...ts/integration/offline_store/test_offline_write.py	26.08% <0.00%> (-73.92%)	⬇️
...fline_store/test_universal_historical_retrieval.py	28.75% <0.00%> (-71.25%)	⬇️
...dk/python/tests/integration/e2e/test_validation.py	27.55% <0.00%> (-69.30%)	⬇️
...ests/integration/e2e/test_python_feature_server.py	31.34% <0.00%> (-68.66%)	⬇️
...s/integration/registration/test_universal_types.py	32.25% <0.00%> (-67.75%)	⬇️
sdk/python/feast/infra/online_stores/redis.py	28.39% <0.00%> (-66.67%)	⬇️
sdk/python/tests/integration/e2e/test_usage_e2e.py	33.87% <0.00%> (-66.13%)	⬇️
sdk/python/tests/data/data_creator.py	34.78% <0.00%> (-65.22%)	⬇️
... and 168 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[adchia]

/lgtm

[adchia]

/lgtm

[feast-ci-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adchia, jerive

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [adchia]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment