forked from luciferous/jwt
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
feat: Add ES256 support to JWK #399
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Feb 9, 2022
Closed
Could this be backported to 6.0.x? |
@glen-84 What is your use-case? You'd like to see this supported in a version <= PHP 7.1? |
I tested this branch while implement Solid Client PHP and it worked as expected. See also jumbojett/OpenID-Connect-PHP#287. |
Merged
@bshaffer Could you tell me please why this PR is not merged? Can I help? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #339
Adds support for parsing
EC256
JWKsYou can test this branch by running the following command:
Then in your code, use as you normally would: