-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
feat: Always assemble Envelopes #9101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2b415ec
fix conflight
HazAT e49b078
feat: Add Spotlight Client
HazAT ab4fdd1
fix: Imports
HazAT c135853
ref: Move sidecar to Spotlight
HazAT 278c6da
ref: Don't have a spotlight transport
HazAT 1568e5b
Merge branch 'develop' into feat/spotlight
HazAT 55d4895
ref: Make enabled consistent
HazAT c777b69
fix: Tests
HazAT 3d61217
Merge branch 'develop' into feat/spotlight
HazAT 7f83c35
ref: Remove try/catch
HazAT cb07217
Merge branch 'develop' into feat/spotlight
HazAT File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
l: Maybe it would be nicer to split this into to methods, than to have this argument:
I guess the idea is that e.g. spotlight would initialize sentry integrations even if not enabled? So that could then just call
client.initializeIntegration()
?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yep see https://github.com/getsentry/spotlight/pull/3/files#diff-0b5adbfe7b36e4ae2f479291e20152e33e940f7f265162d77f40f6bdb5da7405R78
will change it, like your proposalactually, this might be worth doing when we rethink how integrations work
the problem is, I still want to make sure that calling this more than once doesn't setup integrations more than once
with this change, it's not guaranteed that an integration will only be called once