-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
fix(fly): return user with correct auth #56523
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ | |
OrganizationStatus, | ||
UserEmail, | ||
) | ||
from sentry.models.authidentity import AuthIdentity | ||
from sentry.models.user import User | ||
from sentry.services.hybrid_cloud.auth import AuthenticationContext | ||
from sentry.services.hybrid_cloud.filter_query import ( | ||
|
@@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ | |
) | ||
from sentry.services.hybrid_cloud.user.serial import serialize_rpc_user | ||
from sentry.services.hybrid_cloud.user.service import UserService | ||
from sentry.signals import user_signup | ||
|
||
logger = logging.getLogger("user:provisioning") | ||
|
||
|
@@ -172,7 +174,9 @@ def get_first_superuser(self) -> Optional[RpcUser]: | |
return None | ||
return serialize_rpc_user(user) | ||
|
||
def get_or_create_user_by_email(self, *, email: str) -> RpcUser: | ||
def get_or_create_user_by_email( | ||
self, *, email: str, ident: Optional[str] = None, referrer: Optional[str] = None | ||
) -> RpcUser: | ||
with transaction.atomic(router.db_for_write(User)): | ||
user_query = User.objects.filter(email__iexact=email, is_active=True) | ||
# Create User if it doesn't exist | ||
|
@@ -182,12 +186,25 @@ def get_or_create_user_by_email(self, *, email: str) -> RpcUser: | |
email=email, | ||
name=email, | ||
) | ||
user_signup.send_robust( | ||
sender=self, user=user, source="api", referrer=referrer or "unknown" | ||
) | ||
else: | ||
# Users are not supposed to have the same email but right now our auth pipeline let this happen | ||
# So let's not break the user experience | ||
# So let's not break the user experience. Instead return the user with auth identity of ident or | ||
# the first user if ident is None | ||
user = user_query[0] | ||
if user_query.count() > 1: | ||
logger.warning("Email has multiple users", extra={"email": email}) | ||
user = user_query[0] | ||
if ident: | ||
for candid_user in user_query: | ||
identity_query = AuthIdentity.objects.filter( | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @sentaur-athena This might not work. We call
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @dashed I'm aware of that. The problem I'm facing is for the people who have been in this flow before and already have auth_identity created for them. For example:
In this fix I want to make sure that if a user already has an ident return that one from get_or_create_new_user() otherwise it doesn't matter. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @sentaur-athena that makes sense. The case you outlined might be good to add to https://github.com/getsentry/getsentry/blob/master/tests/getsentry/web/channel_provisioning/test_process.py in case you haven't done so. 👍 |
||
user=candid_user, ident=ident | ||
) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Looks like an N+1 query? Probably want to do something like AuthIdentity.objects.filter(user__in=user_query, ident=ident) and then loop over the result. It might also be worth logging if that query returns multiple |
||
if identity_query.exists(): | ||
user = candid_user | ||
break | ||
|
||
return serialize_rpc_user(user) | ||
|
||
def verify_any_email(self, *, email: str) -> bool: | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@ | ||
from sentry.auth.providers.fly.provider import FlyOAuth2Provider | ||
from sentry.models.authidentity import AuthIdentity | ||
from sentry.models.authprovider import AuthProvider | ||
from sentry.services.hybrid_cloud.user.service import user_service | ||
from sentry.testutils.cases import TestCase | ||
from sentry.testutils.silo import control_silo_test | ||
|
@@ -28,3 +31,19 @@ def test_get_user_ci(self): | |
user = self.create_user(email="[email protected]") | ||
fetched_user = user_service.get_or_create_user_by_email(email="[email protected]") | ||
assert user.id == fetched_user.id | ||
|
||
def test_get_user_with_ident(self): | ||
user1 = self.create_user(email="[email protected]", username="1") | ||
user2 = self.create_user(email="[email protected]", username="2") | ||
org = self.create_organization(slug="test") | ||
config_data = FlyOAuth2Provider.build_config(resource={"id": "x1234x"}) | ||
partner_user_id = "u4567u" | ||
provider = AuthProvider.objects.create( | ||
organization_id=org.id, provider="fly", config=config_data | ||
) | ||
AuthIdentity.objects.create(auth_provider=provider, user=user2, ident=partner_user_id) | ||
fetched_user = user_service.get_or_create_user_by_email( | ||
email="[email protected]", ident=partner_user_id | ||
) | ||
assert user2.id == fetched_user.id | ||
assert user1.id != fetched_user.id |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sentaur-athena Since
get_or_create_user_by_email()
is called ingetsentry
, and the function signature has changed, it might be better to use a new function name (e.g.get_or_create_user_by_email2
) so that it's easier to make the switch ongetsentry
.Otherwise, the
get_or_create_user_by_email()
call will error out ongetsentry
.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting. @dashed would it still error although I defined the new parameters as optional? It doesn't error locally without changes in getsentry
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sentaur-athena I think it'll be fine if the new arguments are optional.