-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12k
grammars: 1.5x faster inference w/ complex grammars (vector reserves / reuses) #6609
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3732ad9
grammars: reserve rejects & next candidates
47e37dd
grammars: reuse new_stacks
763b41e
grammars: fix missing sig change in llama.h
db787a4
grammars: fix test (api changed)
cb77a8d
grammars: update gbnf-validator.cpp
1e0f466
grammars: simpler syntax (no swap)
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this better than saying
grammar->stacks = tmp_new_stacks;
? Becausenew_stacks
is.clear()
'd on 11921, it seems like we don't need to save its value here, and we could save a small step (?).Mainly though, the recursive nature of the swap here was making my eyes cross when trying to follow exactly what this change was doing and how the contents of
grammar->stacks
andtmp_new_stacks
were ping-ponging back and forth in this loop, so getting rid of the.swap()
might make it a bit easier to read as well?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW, I tried making this change (into a local
grammar-speedup4
branch), and it didn't significantly improve things, but it wasn't slower, and I think the code is a bit more readable:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Heh, turns out my eyes-crossing swap wasn't even making things faster, removed it / looks simpler thanks.