Skip to content

Revert "werft/vm: Update image" #8599

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2022
Merged

Revert "werft/vm: Update image" #8599

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2022

Conversation

meysholdt
Copy link
Member

@meysholdt meysholdt commented Mar 4, 2022

This reverts commit f141323.

Description

revert #8598 because we removed too many container images from the VM image and workspaces startup times became as bad as described in https://github.com/gitpod-io/ops/issues/1206#issuecomment-1056784252.
Unfortunately, that outweighs the advantage brought by the PR of having a 100GB image instead of a 200GB image.

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #

How to test

Release Notes

NONE

Documentation

/werft no-preview

@meysholdt
Copy link
Member Author

meysholdt commented Mar 4, 2022

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-me-revertnewimage.1

@meysholdt
Copy link
Member Author

meysholdt commented Mar 4, 2022

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-me-revertnewimage.2

@meysholdt
Copy link
Member Author

meysholdt commented Mar 4, 2022

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-me-revertnewimage.3

@meysholdt
Copy link
Member Author

meysholdt commented Mar 4, 2022

/werft run no-preview=true

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-me-revertnewimage.4

@mustard-mh
Copy link
Contributor

/hold
this block merge pool

@mustard-mh
Copy link
Contributor

mustard-mh commented Mar 4, 2022

/werft run

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-me-revertnewimage.5
/unhold

@roboquat roboquat merged commit a1ffee2 into main Mar 4, 2022
@roboquat roboquat deleted the me/revertnewimage branch March 4, 2022 20:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants