-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
Add a branches_count field to Repository #19786
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
type/proposal
The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
Comments
But then Gitea needs to sync the data from git data with database which is complicated. |
Thank you for your replying! The reason I gave this recommendation is because I found it is necessary to prepare a report for the information security chief to make a review for the security audit. And I found it takes a long time to generate a report, so that's why I gave this recommendation. |
depends on #22743 |
lunny
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 29, 2023
Related #14180 Related #25233 Related #22639 Close #19786 Related #12763 This PR will change all the branches retrieve method from reading git data to read database to reduce git read operations. - [x] Sync git branches information into database when push git data - [x] Create a new table `Branch`, merge some columns of `DeletedBranch` into `Branch` table and drop the table `DeletedBranch`. - [x] Read `Branch` table when visit `code` -> `branch` page - [x] Read `Branch` table when list branch names in `code` page dropdown - [x] Read `Branch` table when list git ref compare page - [x] Provide a button in admin page to manually sync all branches. - [x] Sync branches if repository is not empty but database branches are empty when visiting pages with branches list - [x] Use `commit_time desc` as the default FindBranch order by to keep consistent as before and deleted branches will be always at the end. --------- Co-authored-by: Jason Song <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Feature Description
Currently GET
/repos/{owner}/{repo}/branches
is the only way to access this information. However, I am already calling GET/users/{username}/repos
and would like to avoid the extra request if possible.Screenshots
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: