Skip to content

feat: add download count field and unit testing for attachment. #1512

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 20, 2017

Conversation

appleboy
Copy link
Member

@appleboy appleboy commented Apr 19, 2017

  • Add download count field in attachment table. See GitHub API
  • Add unit testing.

@strk
Copy link
Member

strk commented Apr 19, 2017

It takes a migration to add that new field, right ?

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Apr 19, 2017
@appleboy
Copy link
Member Author

@strk Yes.

Copy link
Member

@bkcsoft bkcsoft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise LGTM

assert.NoError(t, PrepareTestDatabase())

attachment, err := GetAttachmentByUUID("1234567890")
assert.NoError(t, err)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

assert.Equal(t, attachment.DownloadCount, int64(0)) ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bkcsoft Done!

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See 8278ac9

@appleboy appleboy changed the title feat: add download count field and unit testing. feat: add download count field and unit testing for attachment. Apr 19, 2017
@bkcsoft
Copy link
Member

bkcsoft commented Apr 19, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Apr 19, 2017
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Apr 19, 2017
@lunny lunny added the type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. label Apr 19, 2017
@strk
Copy link
Member

strk commented Apr 19, 2017

isn't this still lacking a migration ?

CommentID int64
ReleaseID int64 `xorm:"INDEX"`
Name string
DownloadCount int64
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of migration, do this:

  DownloadCount int64 `xorm:"DEFAULT 0"`

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done e35bbb2

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I remember @lunny calling for always adding a migration, not sure why

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's better to do that. I think we can begin to ask all schema changes should use https://github.com/go-xorm/xorm/tree/master/migrate

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <[email protected]>
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Apr 20, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Apr 20, 2017
@appleboy appleboy merged commit fa2a513 into go-gitea:master Apr 20, 2017
@appleboy appleboy deleted the attachment branch April 20, 2017 02:31
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants