Skip to content

Sort on repo size in admin panel #1654

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 2, 2017
Merged

Sort on repo size in admin panel #1654

merged 2 commits into from
May 2, 2017

Conversation

drsect0r
Copy link
Contributor

@drsect0r drsect0r commented May 1, 2017

Fix for #1653

Constructive feedback is appreciated as this is my first pull request.

@lunny lunny added this to the 1.2.0 milestone May 1, 2017
@lunny lunny added the type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality label May 1, 2017
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented May 2, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label May 2, 2017
@@ -666,6 +666,8 @@ issues.label_deletion_desc = Deleting this label will remove its information in
issues.label_deletion_success = This label has been deleted successfully!
issues.label.filter_sort.alphabetically = Alphabetically
issues.label.filter_sort.reverse_alphabetically = Reverse alphabetically
issues.label.filter_sort.by_size = Size
issues.label.filter_sort.reverse_by_size = Reverse Size
Copy link
Member

@sapk sapk May 2, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer not use capital S for Reverse Size and follow format like Reverse alphabetically

@sapk
Copy link
Member

sapk commented May 2, 2017

Except for my little comment LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels May 2, 2017
@drsect0r
Copy link
Contributor Author

drsect0r commented May 2, 2017

@lunny @sapk Thanks! I have pushed the last changes should I rebase or is this good-to-go?

@appleboy
Copy link
Member

appleboy commented May 2, 2017

LGTM

@appleboy appleboy merged commit 87efc8c into go-gitea:master May 2, 2017
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants